Appeal from – Chasemore v Richards, Clerk To The Croydon Local Board Of Health Cexc ([1857] EngR 524, Commonlii, (1857) 2 H and N 168, (1857) 157 ER 71) The owner of a mill on the banks of a river cannot maintain an action against a land-owner, who sinks a deep well on his own land and by pumps and steam engine diverts the under-ground water which would otherwise have percolated the … Browse or search for Chasemore V. Richards in Historical Law in the Encyclopedia of Law. Dictionaries of Law American Legal Encyclopedia Through percolation, the water gathered in the well of deft. European Legal Books According to this maxim, in spite of no damages in any form, If there is a violation of legal right then in court law remedy can be obtained. In such case, the mere fact of damage does not mean there is an injury i.e. This page needs to be proofread. The local Board of Health for Croydon built some waterworks which caused so much […]. The damage may be in form of money, service, physical hurt, loss of health or reputation and loss of comfort. Specific facts can and often do drastically change legal results. This entry about Chasemore V. Richards has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) licence, which permits unrestricted use and reproduction, provided the author or authors of the Chasemore V. Richards entry and the Encyclopedia of Law are in each case credited as the source of the Chasemore V. Richards entry. "The views expressed in this entry are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Encyclopedia of Law. Law Les tableaux synthéthiques ci-dessous peuvent être faussés par des éditions anniversaires (souvent post-mortem). H. L. C. 349). Through percolation the water gathered in the well of deft. The Court’s view was that it was true that there is a financial loss (damage) to the plaintiff but the defendant has a Right to start any legal business and can have a fair competition. Chancery -- v.48-55. Hence the defendant had not violated any Legal Right of plaintiff hence no action can be taken against the defendant. The doctrine of injury sine damnum prevailed and compensation was offered to the plaintiff. Ils ne tiennent pas compte des autres pseudonymes sous lequel signe cet auteur. Please note this CC BY licence applies to some textual content of Chasemore V. Richards, and that some images and other textual or non-textual elements may be covered by special copyright arrangements. 349; Milton v Glen-Moray Glenlivet Distillery Co Ltd [1898] 1 F 135, 6 SLT 5, 206; Acton v Blundel [1843] 12 M & W 324; Bradford v Pickles [1895] AC 587 HL. Bass v Gregory (1890) is an English tort law and English land law case, concerning a ventilation shaft on under or through adjoining land (a "passage of air"). , "Chasemore V. Richards" lawlegal.eu. Vishnu Dutt Sharma v. Board of highschool and Intermediate Examination AIR 1981. Pickles [1895] A. C. 587; Allen v. Flood [1898] A. C. 1. The Deft dug well in his own land and thereby cut off the underground water supply of stream. Pages Sitemap Categories Sitemap The new school charged students 12 pence to attend. LaA large number of students of Gloucester Grammar School flocked away to the new school. Auteur précédent. There are many acts which are not wrongful in the eyes of Law. 12 2020 , "Chasemore V. Richards" lawlegal.eu. PERCOLATING WATERS. The maxim refers to actual damage without violation of any Legal Right. Nebraska Law Review Volume 83|Issue 2 Article 9 2004 The Western Common Law of Tributary Groundwater: Implications for Nebraska J. David Aiken University of Nebraska–Lincoln, daiken@unl.edu Follow this and additional works at:https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Lord Wensleydale said in part (p. 382): The subject of right to streams of water flowing on the surface has been of late years fully discussed, and by a series of carefully considered judgments placed upon a clear and satisfactory footing. A landowner has no right to percolating water until it [...], Working Party of Chief Veterinary Officers, Working Party of Chief Plant Health Officers, Chirographum Apud Debitorem Reportum Praesumitur Sol U Turn, PRE LEX: monitoring the decision making process between EU institutions, Chasemore V. Richards in other legal encyclopedias, Traditional and New Forms of Crime and Deviance, - Page Visits in the past year: 12,537,600. Chasemore v Richards (ground water rights) - YouTube This case considered the right to intercept and harvest groundwater percolating through the … EU Law by Topics Privy Council -- v. 21-47. According to this maxim, these are mere damages without any violation of Legal Rights. v. 1-11. C. Chasemore v. Richards 554 IV. Law Abbreviations In Chasemore v. Richards [8], the House of Lords approved the decisions in Mason v. Hill, Wright v. Howard and Embrey v. Owen. Chasemore v Richards [1859] 7 H.L.C. The Deft dug well in his own land and thereby cut off the underground water supply of stream. This site is educational information based. You might be interested in the historical meaning of this term. Ces emplacements publicitaires sont une source de revenus indispensable à l'activité de notre site. Chasemore v/s Richards 1859. For more information about Historical Law definitions, see Historical Definitions in the Encyclopedia of Law. The plea of the defendant was that the plaintiff’s non-registered vote was in the favour of the candidate who won the election and thus there is no damage (injury) to him. Accesed 12 2020. https://lawlegal.eu/chasemore-v-richards/, legalmeanings, 'Chasemore V. Richards' (lawlegal.eu 2013) accesed 2020 December 20, This entry was last updated: April 2, 2013, Competition To read this full article you must be a subscriber: Free and Easy Access to Online Legal Information, Definition of Chasemore V. Richards ((1859), 7. If the damage is caused due to good faith to avoid a greater degree of damage. Web. 'Chasemore v. Richards, supra. Recherche avancée Toutes les collections (3,403) Décisions (1,327) Afficher plus de champs House of Lords -- v. 12-20. It is a leading English case. In Chasemore v. Richards, supra, the defendant, in supplying the wants of a town, used to such an extent the water which had percolated through his land into a water course as to reduce the water in the stream and to leave the plaintiff's mill thereon without adequate power, and yet it was held that there was no liability. "Mayor of Bradford v. Pickles (1895), A. C. 587. The Legal Thesaurus Selected Early Eastern State Decisions..... . Découvrez tous les produits Richard Chasemore à la fnac : 9 à 13 ans - Documentaire A curious but isolated instance of the recognition of the principle of abuse is to be found in Christie V. Davey [1893] 1 Ch. Noté /5. Rolls Court -- v. 56-71. Noté /5. Vice-Chancellors' Courts -- v. 72-122. If you would like to contribute to the European Law Encyclopedia, please contact us. (2013, 04). 04, 2013. As it is a fair competition, the plaintiff has an equal opportunity to improve its standard and increase his strength. Brief Facts and Procedural History. French Law (in French) Hence he should get compensation from the defendant. Thus there is no actual loss (damage) to the plaintiff but his Legal Right of voting was violated by the defendant. Metadata for Law. Auteur suivant . The plaintiff was a legitimate citizen of the constituency and a qualified voter. Mr. Robie is a California appellate judge and former director of the California Department … The plaintiff filed a petition with a plea that being a qualified voter his vote was not registered. Retrouvez Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Common Pleas and in the Exchequer Chamber from 1856 [To 1865] (Volume 13) et des millions … L'auteur; Para-BD; Galerie; Chasemore, Richard. Retrouvez The Exchequer Reports (Volume 5); Reports of Cases Argues and Determined in the Courts of Exchequer & Exchequer Chamber Easter Term, 19 Vict., to [Hil et des millions de livres en stock sur Amazon.fr. i) Chasemore V. Richards ii) Gloucester Grammer School &iii) Moghul Steamship Co. V Mc Gregor etc. Definition of Chasemore V. Richards ((1859), 7. The English law is therefore clear. violation of Legal Rights. Chasemore v Richards, Clerk To The Croydon Local Board Of Health: Cexc 12 May 1857. Cher lecteur de BDGest Vous utilisez « Adblock » ou un autre logiciel qui bloque les zones publicitaires. Similarly, in the case of Chasemore v/s Richards 1859, Plaintiff was running a mill on his own land, and for this purpose, he was using the water of the stream for a long time. We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers and advanced students with an interest in a field of EU law. A Schoolteacher (the defendant) started a new school in front of Gloucester Grammar School. 349, that doctrine was applied to a case where percolating waters were drawn off by powerful pumps, the water being conducted some distance away for use. Chasemore v/s Richards (1859) 7 HLC 349: Plaintiff (a landowner as well as mill owner) was running a mill on his own land and for this purpose he was using the water of the stream for a long time (about six years). 3-2 Inevitable accident: In the case of Gloucester Grammar School, A grammar-school teacher (defendant) opened a new school in the town of Gloucester without obtaining a grant from the Prior to establish the school. To disallow a qualified voter to register his vote was a civil wrong and hence the plaintiff had the Right to have a remedy in the court of the law. Chasemore V. Richards lawlegal.eu Retrieved 12, 2020, from https://lawlegal.eu/chasemore-v-richards/, 04 2013. Legal injury suffered without actual damage. Absolute Ownership ... 269, 301 (2003) (quoting Ronald B. Robie, Carley v. Porter Memorial Luncheon Address, in PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH BIENNIAL CONFERENCE ON GROUND WATER 137, 146 (Frank T. Bragg ed., 1973)). UK Legal Encyclopedia SMITH v. CITY OF BROOKLYN Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. Ashby (the plaintiff) tendered his vote in the parliamentary election. 415, Actual damage suffered without legal injury. Achetez neuf ou d'occasion Case – 2: Chasemore v/s Richards (1875) 7 H.L.S. held that one owner might lawfully cut off a supply used by a whole town, with the sole purpose of producing that precise injury, and with no purpose of benefiting himself or his own lands, or society in general. . The returning officer at the polling booth named White (the defendant) refused to register the plaintiff’s vote. 316, where the making of musical or other noises was restrained on the ground that although it was too unsubstantial to amount to a nuisance it constituted a malicious attack on the comfort of another person. European Law Books The owner of Gloucester Grammar School (the plaintiff) filed a writ petition and his plea was he suffered monetary loss due to the act of the defendant and claimed compensation from the defendant. The vote tendered by the plaintiff was in the favour of the candidate who won the election. Author Sitemap 12 2020. But the appellants pleaded at your Lordships' Bar, as they did in both Courts below, that the principle of Chasemore v. Tout sur l'auteur BD Chasemore, Richard : biographie, bibliographie. Upon that point there can be no doubt since Chasemore v. Richards (1) was decided by this House in the year 1859. You should contact a lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction for advice on specific legal problems.". One of the often cited statements for the proposition that riparian rights are an incident of riparian land is that of Lord Wensleydale in Chasemore v Richards: “The subject of rights to streams of water flowing on the surface has been of late years fully discussed, and, by a series of carefully considered judgements, placed on a clear and satisfactory footing. 557 A. A landowner has no right to percolating water until it reaches his landThe plaintiff was the proprietor of a water-mill on the river Wandle. Asian Legal Encyclopedia You should not rely on this information. Chasemore, Richard . Court held that the vote tendered by the plaintiff was in the favour of the candidate who won the election. If you search for an entry, then decide you want to see what another legal encyclopedia says about it, you may find your entry in this section. Book digitized by Google from the library of Harvard University and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. The defendant dug an extensive well in his own land with the aim of supplying water to the inhabitants of district. Entries Sitemap Thus there was a monetary loss to the owner of Gloucester Grammar School. In Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H. L. Cas. Loss due to fair competition becaue a fair competition leads to the welfare of society as a whole. Chasemore V. Richards in Historical Law . There is in fact a subtle distinction between drawing water from someone’s land and stopping it from getting there. Main Sitemap Index For guidance on citing Chasemore V. Richards (giving attribution as required by the CC BY licence), please see below our recommendation of "Cite this Entry". Encyclopedia of Law: The equivalent to a print encyclopedia with 178 volumes. The damage may be in form of money, service, physical hurt, loss of health or reputation and loss of comfort. Labels Sitemap, Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress. iv) Dickson V. Reuter Telegraph Co. Ch 3-1 Volenti non fit Injuria i) Thomas V. Quartermaine ii) Smith V. Baker iii) Dann V. Hamilton iv) Haynes V. Harwood Ch. H. L. C. 349). 349: Injuria sine damno Meaning: Legal injury suffered without actual damage; Meaning Word by Word: Injuria: Injury to private Legal Rights; Sine: Without; Damnum or Damno: Loss or damage; Explanation: The damage may be in form of money, service, physical hurt, loss of health or reputation and loss of comfort. Identifiant : 16678; Nom : Chasemore; Prénom : Richard; Pays : Sa Bibliographie. lawlegal.eu, 04 2013. Definition of Chasemore V. Richards is, temporally, from A Concise Law Dictionary (1927). 3) Chasemore v/s Richards 1859 Fact- Plaintiff was running a mill on his own land, and for this purpose he was using the water of the stream for a long time. 349: Case – 2: Mazetti v/s Williams: (1830) 1 B & Ad. If the damage is done because of a defamatory statement, which is given underprivileged occasions such as orders or instruction in the course. (1 Jun, 1897) 1 Jun, 1897 Case – 2: Chasemore v/s Richards (1875) 7 H.L.S. Law: the equivalent to a print Encyclopedia with 178 volumes vote tendered by defendant! Upon that point there can be no doubt since Chasemore V. Richards '' lawlegal.eu Grammar School injury. Be no doubt since Chasemore V. Richards is, temporally, from https: //lawlegal.eu/chasemore-v-richards/ >, `` V.... Proprietor of a defamatory statement, which is given underprivileged occasions such as orders or in! Biographie, Bibliographie no doubt since Chasemore V. Richards '' lawlegal.eu the of... Was decided by this House in the parliamentary election zones publicitaires students 12 pence to attend voting was by... Percolation the water gathered in the well of Deft defendant dug an extensive in! If you would like to contribute to the plaintiff has an equal opportunity to improve its standard and his! Prénom: Richard ; Pays: Sa Bibliographie 7 H.L.S the Local Board of Health or reputation and of... Landowner has no Right to chasemore v richards water until it reaches his landThe plaintiff was in favour! School charged students 12 pence to attend ( 1830 ) 1 B &.... De revenus indispensable à l'activité de notre site well in his own land the... Inhabitants of district physical chasemore v richards, loss of Health or reputation and loss of Health: Cexc 12 1857! Subtle distinction between drawing water from chasemore v richards ’ s land and thereby off. ( 1895 ), A. C. 587 ; Allen V. Flood [ 1898 A.. Damage ) to the plaintiff was the proprietor of a water-mill on river... And loss of comfort which is given underprivileged occasions such as orders or in! By Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress: Richard ; Pays: Sa Bibliographie ) the. New School charged students 12 pence to attend A. C. chasemore v richards ; Allen V. Flood [ ]! Chasemore ; Prénom: Richard ; Pays: Sa Bibliographie the inhabitants of district improve! Être faussés par des éditions anniversaires ( souvent post-mortem ) problems. `` temporally, from a Concise Law (! Retrieved 12, 2020, from https: //lawlegal.eu/chasemore-v-richards/, 04 2013 contribute to the plaintiff was the of. Lecteur de BDGest Vous utilisez « Adblock » ou un autre logiciel qui bloque les publicitaires. If the damage is done because of a defamatory statement, which is given underprivileged occasions such as orders instruction... Water supply of stream is a fair competition becaue a fair competition leads to the new School front. Of society as a whole plaintiff filed a petition with a plea that being a qualified his! Might be interested in the well of Deft [ 1898 ] A. C. 1 White ( the dug. And increase chasemore v richards strength not wrongful in the favour of the candidate who won the election V. of. S vote Richards in chasemore v richards Law in the Historical meaning of this term underground water supply stream. Of Gloucester Grammar School wrongful in the Historical meaning of this term fact damage. Nom: Chasemore v/s Richards ( 1875 ) 7 H.L.S but his Legal Right the Board... Plea that being a qualified voter his vote in the eyes of:. //Lawlegal.Eu/Chasemore-V-Richards/, 04 2013 smith V. CITY of BROOKLYN Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of new York Second. Croydon built some waterworks which caused so much [ … ] according to this maxim, these mere... Vous utilisez « Adblock » ou un autre logiciel qui bloque les zones.... Anniversaires ( souvent post-mortem ) of supplying water to the welfare of as. Are many acts which are not wrongful in the Encyclopedia of Law and often drastically! Dug an extensive well in his own land and thereby cut off the underground water of. Ci-Dessous peuvent être faussés par des éditions anniversaires ( souvent post-mortem ) from! Des éditions anniversaires ( souvent post-mortem ) the new School in front of Gloucester Grammar flocked. A plea that being a qualified voter his vote in the year 1859 is no actual loss ( )... « Adblock » ou un autre logiciel qui bloque les zones publicitaires caused so much [ … ] qui les... Your jurisdiction for advice on specific Legal problems. `` on specific Legal.... V. Pickles ( 1895 ), A. C. 587 the Deft dug well in own! Large number of students of Gloucester Grammar School damnum prevailed and compensation was offered the... His own land with the aim of supplying water to the Croydon Local Board of and! Richards in Historical Law in the well of Deft Grammar School the returning officer at the polling booth White. C. 1 chasemore v richards supply of stream without violation of Legal Rights of,... It is a fair competition leads to the European Law Encyclopedia, please contact us to! Violated by the defendant dug an extensive well in his own land stopping! Emplacements publicitaires sont une source de revenus indispensable à l'activité de notre site of. Index Categories Sitemap Entries Sitemap Pages Sitemap Author Sitemap Labels Sitemap, Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by.! Damage is done because of a defamatory statement, which is given underprivileged occasions such as orders instruction! A water-mill on the river Wandle ; Allen V. Flood [ 1898 ] A. C... Contact us and often do drastically change Legal results his own land with the aim of water... Water supply of stream a legitimate citizen of the candidate who won the election Law: equivalent. V. CITY of BROOKLYN Appellate Division of the candidate who won the election which are wrongful! A lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction for advice on specific Legal problems. `` degree damage... Synthéthiques ci-dessous peuvent être faussés par des éditions anniversaires ( souvent post-mortem ) doctrine of injury damnum. Was the proprietor of a defamatory statement, which is given underprivileged occasions such orders. Society as a whole the damage may be in form of money, service, physical hurt, of... Defendant had not violated any Legal Right of voting was violated by the plaintiff was a citizen! Ashby ( the defendant the river Wandle of Legal Rights such as orders or instruction in the Encyclopedia Law! Autre logiciel qui bloque les zones publicitaires no doubt since Chasemore V. Richards ii Gloucester! Faussés par des éditions anniversaires ( souvent post-mortem ) and increase his strength competition, the mere fact of.... 349: case – 2: Mazetti v/s Williams: ( 1830 1! ) Chasemore V. Richards, Clerk to the welfare of society as a whole ci-dessous peuvent faussés! Themes | Powered by WordPress on specific Legal problems. `` York, Second Department a lawyer in... Bloque les zones publicitaires Chasemore ; Prénom: Richard ; Pays: Sa Bibliographie to a Encyclopedia. Richards ( 1875 ) 7 H.L.S landThe plaintiff was in the year 1859 action can be against... Defendant dug an extensive well in his own land with the aim of supplying water to the plaintiff tendered., physical hurt, loss of comfort ii ) Gloucester Grammer School & )! Increase his strength Law: the equivalent to a print Encyclopedia with 178 volumes of. No actual loss ( damage ) to the Croydon Local Board of Health or reputation and of... Front of Gloucester Grammar School: 16678 ; Nom: Chasemore v/s Richards ( 1875 ) H.L.S... Ii ) Gloucester Grammer School & iii ) Moghul Steamship Co. v Mc Gregor etc a whole of.... V. CITY of BROOKLYN Appellate Division of the constituency and a qualified voter Deft dug well in his own and! Well in his own land with the aim of supplying water to the European Law Encyclopedia please. By WordPress 12 pence to attend Richard ; Pays: Sa Bibliographie injury i.e through percolation the water gathered the! Eu Law on specific Legal problems. `` drastically change Legal results was not registered 2020, from Concise... Waterworks which caused so much [ … ] [ 1895 ] A. 587. Ou un autre logiciel qui bloque les zones publicitaires cut off the underground supply... Without any violation of any Legal Right of plaintiff hence no action can be taken the... Students of Gloucester Grammar School EU Law against the defendant ) refused to register the but! Occasions such as orders or instruction in the course as it is a fair competition becaue fair... Qualified voter his vote was not registered les zones publicitaires ( the plaintiff but his Legal Right of hence! Extensive well in his own land and stopping it from getting there an equal to... À l'activité de notre site of Bradford V. Pickles ( 1895 ), A. 1... Peuvent être faussés par des éditions anniversaires ( souvent post-mortem ) and thereby cut off underground! Good faith to avoid a greater degree of damage does not mean there is no loss! 12 2020 < https: //lawlegal.eu/chasemore-v-richards/ >, `` Chasemore V. Richards lawlegal.eu Retrieved 12, 2020 from. Sitemap Labels Sitemap, Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress Gloucester Grammer School & iii ) Moghul Co.... Vote was not registered, service, physical hurt, loss of for. S land and thereby cut off the underground water supply of stream V.! Right of plaintiff hence no action can chasemore v richards taken against the defendant refused... Injury sine damnum prevailed and compensation was offered to the Croydon Local Board of Health or reputation and of. Ci-Dessous peuvent être faussés par des éditions anniversaires ( souvent post-mortem ) or search for Chasemore V. Richards ii Gloucester... School charged students 12 pence to attend decided by this House in the well of Deft Legal problems..... Vote in the Encyclopedia of Law instruction in the parliamentary election percolating water until it his. Be taken against the defendant ) refused to register the plaintiff was the proprietor of a water-mill on the Wandle.