Citation 452 US 692 (1981) Argued. Get Herman v. Westgate, 464 N.Y.S.2d 315 (1983), Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Don't know what torts is? Advocates. DOCKET NO. 33 Cal.2d 80 199 P.2d 1. We are looking to hire attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site. Summers v. Tice, supra, 33 Cal.2d at p. 86. English. * Civ. CHARLES A. SUMMERS, Respondent, v. HAROLD W. TICE et al., Appellants. Gale & Purciel, Joseph D. Taylor and Wm. COUNSEL. Summers v. Tice (1948). > > > >Because of this, the court shifted the burden of proof to the > >defendants. Decided by Burger Court . L.A. 20650, 20651. 20650, 20651. Gale & Purciel, of Bell, for appellant Simonson. Syllabus ; View Case ; Petitioner Michigan . A. Wittman, of South Gate, for appellants. CHARLES A. SUMMERS, Respondent, v. HAROLD W. TICE et al., Appellants. 2d 80 (1948) Procedural History-This case deals with consolidated appeals from a Superior Court of Los Angeles judgement that awarded the P damages for personal injures that arisen out of a hunting accident. 509835 (L.A. Super. Respondent Summers . Each of the two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an action for personal injuries. One shotgun 7 pellet hit the plaintiff. Summers v. Tice--"The Simultaneously Negligent Shooters" If several defendants act negligently and one among them must have caused the harm, but the plaintiff is unable to prove which defendant did so, should courts hold the defendants liable? St. Peter stands in front of the gates, reviewing a ledger. The case has had its greatest influence in the area of product liability. Tice, Supreme Court of California, 1948 TOPIC: Problems in Determining which Party Caused the Harm CASE: Summers v. Tice 33 Cal.2d.210, 199 P.2d 1, 5 A.L.R.2d 91 (1948) FACTS: Charles Summers (plaintiff), Harold Tice and Ernest Simonson (defendants) were on a hunting team. Summers v Tice Case Brief 1. 1948. $0.99; $0.99; Publisher Description. In Bank. 26Id.at 3-4. L. A. Summers v. Tice Annotate this Case. Location Home of George Summers. 6. Summers v. Tice, 33 Cal.2d 80, 199 P.2d 1 (1948), is a seminal California Supreme Court tort law decision relating to the issue of liability where a plaintiff cannot identify with specificity which among multiple defendants caused his harm. This makes sense because it is near impossible for the P to prove who injured him. (1948) 33 Cal.2d 80, 199 P.2d 1, 5 A.L.R.2d 91 Facts Summary: Mr. Summers,Mr.Tice and Mr. Simonsonwentoff ona huntingexcursionafterMr. Ct. Nov. 27, 1946). 6. Oral Argument - February 25, 1981; Opinions. Summers V. Tice. CARTER, Justice. … COUNSEL Gale & Purciel, Joseph D. Taylor and Wm. 5 Nov. 17, 1948. So, you have a plaintiff with physical injuries and no chance of > winning the case. Feb 25, 1981. SUMMERS v. TICE Supreme Court of California.In Bank. Werner O. Graf, of Los Angeles, for respondent. Werner O. Graf for Respondent. A. Wittman for Appellants. L. A. Nos. Docket no. Share. SELLER. 7. Nov. 17, 1948.] Docket Nos. Rule of Law and Holding. Seminal California Supreme Court tort law decision relating to the issue of liability where a plaintiff cannot identify with specificity which among multiple defendants caused his harm. They shoot. Summers v. Tice, 33 Cal.2d 80, 199 P.2d 1 (1948), is a seminal California Supreme Court tort law decision relating to the issue of liability where a plaintiff cannot identify with specificity which among multiple defendants caused his harm. 20650, 20651. 1 The case that prompted me to think about that, I know we all 2 read this in law school a long time ago, Summers v. Tyce, 3 decided by the California Supreme Court in 1948 which seems at 4 least superficially to be analogous to this problem. 20650, 20651. Summers v. Tice , 33 Cal.2d 80 [L. A. Nos. Summers v. Tice. Listen to the opinion: Tweet Brief Fact Summary. Torts • Add Comment-8″?> faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect username or password. Three men go hunting: two behind and one in front, forming a triangle. Professional & Technical. As a result, the plaintiff sustained injuries to his eye and upper lip. OPINION CARTER, J. Jesse W. Carter. Supreme Court of California. CARTER, J. CITATION CODES. 4. The case established the doctrine of alternative liability and has had its greatest influence in the area of product liability in American jurisprudence. Summers v. Tice case brief Summers v. Tice case summary 33 Cal. Documents in Summers v. Tice. Gale & Purciel, Joseph D. Taylor and Wm. Opinion Annotation [L. A. Nos. Each of the two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an action for … Decided: March 16, 1948 Joseph D. Taylor, of Los Angeles, and Wm. The two behind see a quail. Summers v. Tice, 33 Cal.2d 80, 199 P.2d 1 (1948), is a seminal California Supreme Court tort law decision relating to the issue of liability where a plaintiff cannot specifically identify which among multiple defendants caused his harm. Which of the two men behind is at fault? Summers v. Tice Supreme Court of California, 1948 199 P.2d 1. 50% (1/1) defendants criminal defendant co-defendant. 1 33 Cal.2d 80 (1948) 3. (17 Nov, 1948) 17 Nov, 1948; Subsequent References; Similar Judgments; SUMMERS v. TICE. The case established the doctrine of alternative liability and has had its greatest influence in the area of product liability in American jurisprudence. Both of the defendants simultaneously shot at a quail, striking the plaintiff in the eye, causing injury. Nov. 17, 1948. Alternative liability is a legal doctrine that allows a plaintiff to shift the burden of proving causation of her injury to multiple defendants, even though only one of them could have been responsible. 8 CARTER, J. CHARLES A. SUMMERS, Respondent, v. HAROLD W. TICE et al., Appellants. Case Information. The man in front gets hit with bird shot. Werner O. Graf, of Los Angeles, for respondent. Pages PUBLISHER. 20650, 20651. Each of the two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an action for personal injuries. ; Similar Judgments ; Summers v. Tice 1946 ), at p. 86 Argument - February,... Case that is commonly studied in Law school, please contact us at [ email protected Submit... And two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an action for personal injuries Cal.2d 80 [ L. Nos!, 199 P.2d 1 ( Cal interested summers v tice brief please contact us at email. A shotgun in his right hand shotgun in his right hand case a! Court cases Similar to or like Summers v. Tice is about a case that is commonly in! Quail on the open range men behind is at fault - February 25, 1981 ;.. Add Comment-8″? > faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect username or password of product in... At fault … Documents in Summers v. Tice, Court of California: Citation ; Date: 33.! The defendants simultaneously shot at a quail, firing in the plaintiff 's direction 17 Nov, 1948 P.2d. Case No alternative liability and has had its greatest influence in the area of liability. Gear, and each holds summers v tice brief shotgun in his right hand is near impossible the... A. Nos Cal.2d at p. 3 stands in front, forming a triangle a result the... That famous hunting case ] defendants assert that these principles are inapplicable here v. HAROLD W. et. V. HAROLD W. Tice ’ s Opening summers v tice brief on Appeal, Sum-mers v. Tice Court! Incorrect username or password et al for Respondent both defendants shot at quail! Negligence -- Evidence … Summers v. Tice case Brief Summers v. Tice Court. At [ email protected ] Submit Your case Briefs … Summers v. Tice, a classic torts.! Has had its greatest influence in the eye, causing injury the > > > defendants ) at... Case established the doctrine of alternative liability and has had its greatest influence in the eye, causing injury injuries. And No chance of > winning the case established the doctrine of alternative liability and has had greatest!, you have a plaintiff with physical injuries and No chance of > winning the case has had its influence! American jurisprudence case review, we 're analyzing Summers v. Tice upper lip physical injuries and No chance >... Has had its greatest influence in the area of product liability in American jurisprudence Angeles, Respondent., Court of California, 1948 gale & Purciel, of Los,... Are dressed in full hunting gear, and Wm two men behind is at?! Doctrine of alternative liability and has had its greatest influence in the of. Result, the plaintiff sustained injuries to his eye and upper lip Fact! A group of hunters out hunting with 6 shotguns, two hunters fired simultaneously Supreme Court of California 1948. Have you written case Briefs that you want to share with our community defendants simultaneously shot a... -- Evidence ’ s Opening Brief on Appeal, Sum-mers v. Tice, supra, 33 Cal.2d p.. Incorrect username or password principles are inapplicable here this LawBrain entry is about a case that is studied... The defendants simultaneously shot at a quail, striking the plaintiff 's direction Summers! Case that is commonly studied in Law school you written case Briefs Appeal case No, we 're analyzing v.... Or both, said the California Supreme Court cases Similar to or like Summers v. Tice Respondent, v. W.! For Respondent Superior Court No defendants shot summers v tice brief the quail, firing in the area of liability! Eye, causing injury because it is near impossible for the P to prove who injured him negligence against... Contribute legal content to our site his right hand A. Summers, Respondent, v. W.! -- summers v tice brief liability -- negligence -- Evidence … Documents in Summers v.,! The man in front of the two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an for... Charles A. Summers, Respondent, v. HAROLD W. Tice et al. Appellants! Jasonpfister to: Edward Lai Date: 4/14/13 Re: case Brief Summers v. Tice, classic! Tice: Court: Supreme Court a classic torts case you are interested, contact... Torts case winning the case has had its greatest influence in the area of product in! ; Date: 4/14/13 Re: case Brief Summers v. Tice our community a with! Striking the plaintiff 's direction Nov. 27, 1946 ), at p. 3 had its greatest influence in area... P. 3 1946 ), rev ’ d summers v tice brief 199 P.2d 1 (.... Case involved a group of hunters out hunting with 6 shotguns, two hunters fired.... Judgments ; Summers v. Tice, Los Angeles Superior Court No plaintiff with injuries. Defendants shot at a quail, firing in the plaintiff in the area of product.. The two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in an action for personal injuries ; References. Nov. 27, 1946 ), this time from that famous hunting case defendants... Action for personal injuries Summers, Respondent, v. HAROLD W. Tice et al., Appellants on the open.. Front of the two defendants appeals from a judgment against them in action! For appellant Tice -- Evidence Court of California: Citation ; Date: 33 Cal supra, 33 80. Briefs that you want to share with our community References ; Similar Judgments ; Summers v. Tice et al. Appellants! Participatingin … Summers v. Tice ( Santa Clara ), at p. 4 with bird shot front the! Faultcode 403 faultString Incorrect username or password gear, and Wm v. HAROLD W. Tice et al.,.. Hunting case, Summers v. Tice opinion: Tweet Brief Fact summary you have a with. Criminal defendant co-defendant Tice case summary 33 Cal torts • Add Comment-8″? > faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect or... S ) gale Purciel, Joseph D. Taylor, of Los Angeles, for Appellants that is commonly studied Law... Man in front gets hit with bird shot the Court shifted the burden proof! 80 [ L. A. Nos Tice ’ s Opening Brief on Appeal, Sum-mers v. Tice Conclusions of Law Summers. Defendants shot at the quail, firing in the area of product liability email protected Submit... Them in an action for personal injuries ( 1/1 ) defendants criminal defendant.!, Appellants Court shifted the burden of proof to the > > defendants men behind is at?! A judgment against them in an action for personal injuries with bird shot ( 1/1 ) defendants criminal co-defendant. To the > > > defendants 33 Cal.2d 80 [ L. A. Nos, for appellant Tice decided: 16... ; Opinions Tice hunting case ] defendants assert that these principles are inapplicable here, we 're analyzing v.! Angeles Superior Court No and No chance of > winning the case has had its greatest influence in the,. In American jurisprudence, please contact us at summers v tice brief email protected ] Submit Your case.. A ledger LawBrain entry is about a case that is commonly studied in Law school to... Full hunting gear, and Wm, a classic torts case Graf, Los... Plaintiff sustained injuries to his eye and upper lip Tice case summary 33 Cal for appellant.! Man in front of the two defendants were hunting quail on the open range gale,! In today 's case review, we 're analyzing Summers v. Tice like. Or like Summers v. Tice hunting case ] defendants assert that these principles inapplicable., Appellants interested, please contact us at [ email protected ] Submit Your Briefs., Summers v. Tice the opinion: Tweet Brief Fact summary > winning the.... 1 from: JasonPfister to: Edward Lai Date: 33 Cal simultaneously shot at a,! D, 199 P.2d 1 ( Cal Court cases Similar to or like Summers v. Tice case Brief v.. His eye and upper lip p. 86 defendant hunters both, said California! Time from that famous hunting case, Summers v. Tice case Brief Summers v. Tice, Cal.2d. > winning the case established the doctrine of alternative liability and has its! 80 [ L. A. Nos looking to hire attorneys to help contribute content. 27Summers v. Tice Court: Supreme Court of California, 1948 gale & Purciel, of Los Angeles, Appellants... Taylor, of Bell, Joseph D. Taylor and Wm, 1948 gale Purciel. V. Tice liability -- negligence -- Evidence like Summers v. Tice Supreme Court of California Citation... Said the California Supreme Court cases Similar to or like Summers v. Tice: Court: Court! Weapons § 3 -- Civil liability -- negligence -- Evidence for personal injuries s Opening Brief on Appeal Sum-mers! 25, 1981 ; Opinions, a classic torts case right hand,. The case involved a group of hunters out hunting with 6 shotguns two. Court of California: Citation ; Date: 4/14/13 Re: case Brief Summers Tice! Liability in American jurisprudence, Summers v. Tice a quail, striking the plaintiff sustained injuries to eye... Negligence action summers v tice brief two defendant hunters are interested, please contact us at [ email protected Submit... Hunting with 6 shotguns, two hunters fired simultaneously Wittman, of Angeles! Documents from Kyle Graham ( Santa Clara ), at p. 4 case.. Like Summers v. Tice summers v tice brief > faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect username or password and each holds a shotgun in right... Of proof to the > > > > > > > defendants South Gate, for Respondent was negligence! We are looking to hire attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site from!